University of Delaware Says All Whites are Racists

The University of Delaware is attempting to force politically correct acceptance and diversity on its white students by starting up a mandatory program that requires the dorm-housed students to accept that all whites, and only whites, are racists, and to seek university-provided 'treatment.' This is just more proof of how whites in this country are quickly becoming the most attacked group of people by far, and anybody that says so is automatically viewed as a 'racist' among many other misinterpreted broad ideologies. It only keeps getting worse, and until programs and acts of stupidity like this are made examples of, it will only continue. Since when did it become a crime to be of a majority?

The organization cited excerpts from the university's Office of Residence Life Diversity Education Training documents, including the statement:

"A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. 'The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality. By this definition, people of color cannot be racists, because as peoples within the U.S. system, they do not have the power to back up their prejudices, hostilities, or acts of discrimination….'"

The education program also notes that "reverse racism" is "a term created and used by white people to deny their white privilege." And "a non-racist" is called "a non-term," because, the program explains, "The term was created by whites to deny responsibility for systemic racism, to maintain an aura of innocence in the face of racial oppression, and to shift the responsibility for that oppression from whites to people of color (called 'blaming the victim')."

Fed Cuts Interest Rates Again

The Federal Reserve just recently cut interest rates by .25% to 4.5%, a quarter less than what was feared earlier this week, in order to 'bail out' the credit and housing markets. The Dollar has already fallen to more all-time lows this week due to the fears of a rate cut, gold is about to surge above 800, and oil is now at $94. Again the Fed puts irresponsible people and the big bankers and money makers ahead of common citizens and our national currency. Hello inflation.

"The pace of economic expansion will likely slow in the near term, partly reflecting the intensification of the housing correction," the Fed said in a statement announcing its decision.

The central bank said its action was designed to help "promote moderate growth over time."

Update: Sherry Jackson Found Guilty on All Counts!

Update: Sherry Peel Jackson has just been convicted on all four counts by a bogus jury in an even more bogus unfair trial. More updates later. This is absolutely outrageous, and someone's got to pay for this.

Merrill Lynch CEO Gone After Covert Attempt to Sell

Merrill Lynch has suffered big losses since housing and credit woes hit rock bottom. CEO Stan O'Neal reported a $2.2 billion loss in the third quarter, as he wrote off almost eight billion. It was just last week that O'Neal tried to sell the company off to Wachovia without first talking with his board members. They were so upset about it that they were already going over possible replacements last week, so this comes to no surprise.

O'Neal is reported to of stepped down himself, but he knew his outing was just around the corner. Since he took over the company four years ago around 30,000 people have lost their jobs, and he's never been very popular among the financial community to say the least. He is the first CEO to be outed since the housing and mortgage woes. The stock was down today because of the uncertainty of who will succeed O'Neal, and no word yet on who that will be. He is set to receive a rather large exit package, and like all the other embattled CEOs in the past that didn't do their jobs well, plenty of people won't be happy about this, especially those 30,000 that don't have their jobs. But Mr. O'Neal seems to only be thinking of himself as always, as his exit statement only mentions his opportunities and gains from being with the company.

Merrill Lynch said O'Neal "decided to retire" and its board of directors had elected Alberto Cribiore, a member of the board since 2003, as interim non-executive chairman and chair of a search committee to recruit a new chief executive.

The firm said it would look within its ranks and elsewhere for a new CEO.

"Mr. O'Neal and the board of directors both agreed that a change in leadership would best enable Merrill Lynch to move forward and focus on maintaining the strong operating performance of its businesses, which the company last week reported were performing well, apart from subprime mortgages and CDOs (collaterized debt obligations)," Merrill Lynch said in a statement.

Cheney Spouts More Hatred; What to Do About Him...

Dick Cheney was on NBC's 'Meet the Press' Sunday with Tim Russert, and as always it was a total neoconservative hate fest. Dick started off by spouting the usual lying rhetoric against Iran, and how we're "in the final stages of diplomacy." Not surprisingly he failed to mention how his administration had attempted any kind of diplomacy outside outrageous sanctions that make the problem worse. He didn't hold back from making racist comments in the interview either, nor did he shy away (braggingly) from drawing up pictures and images of a nuclear bomb dropping down on Iran. He ended by stating pretty much what we already know, that this administration wants this conflict badly, and wants it done before they leave office. Cheney's words are downright scary.

This bodes a very serious question though. This administration has shown it is planning to kill what's left of our country by demanding a conflict with Iran before they end their term. Hypothetically speaking, how are we as true Americans going to allow these blue-blooded criminals get away with this without just plain killing them? They have shown always that they listen to nothing other than fear and force. Our options are running thin, and the info war is quickly turning into something much bigger and serious with the passing of HR 1955. Gas prices will be on average around six dollars per gallon, anti-Americanism will be at a disaster-like high, a slave state of martial law will be right around the corner, and the U.S. Dollar will be on the verge of absolute collapse, sending us into a new depression era that makes the other one look quite minor. There might be a time very soon in which deadly force is necessary to save this country from the worst-case scenario, and we shouldn't be afraid of merely talking about it. Someone needs to look out for the best interests of our country, and very few in Washington seem to want to do that. The only way to save this country is with the people finally taking back what's theirs.

Full transcript can be seen here.

RUSSERT: How close are we to war with Iran?

CHENEY: Well, I think we are in the final stages of diplomacy, obviously. We have done virtually everything we can with respect to carrots, if you will. It’s time for squash. Not to mention mushrooms, clouds of them.

...

RUSSERT: Isn’t Secretary Rice still pushing carrots for Iran?

CHENEY: The more carrots Condi feeds ’em, the better they’ll be able to see the bombs coming.

RUSSERT: First you threatened to take action if Iran built a nuclear weapon. Now you’re threatening to take action if Iran knows how to build a nuclear weapon. What’s next? You threaten to take action if Ahmadinejad dresses up as a nuclear weapon for Halloween?

CHENEY: Well, the difficulty here is, each time he has rejected what he was called upon to do by the international community. I’m not sure now, no matter what he says, that anyone would believe him. He’s pretending he doesn’t have W.M.D., just like Saddam.

RUSSERT: But Saddam didn’t have W.M.D.

CHENEY: He did, Tim.

RUSSERT: He did?

CHENEY: Ever wonder what happened to them?

RUSSERT: What happened to them?

CHENEY: Think about it, Tim.

RUSSERT: The New York Times reported yesterday that the suspected nuclear reactor in Syria bombed by Israeli jets was well under construction in 2003, the same year we went to war with Syria’s neighbor Iraq. Did we go after the wrong country?

CHENEY: Syria is not a country, Tim. It’s a way station run by an eye doctor.

...

RUSSERT: Conservatives are tossing around some lock-and-load language. The president is talking about Iran sparking a “nuclear holocaust” and World War III. Giuliani adviser Norman Podhoretz thinks we’re in World War IV. Shouldn’t you at least give the new sanctions against Iran a chance to work?

CHENEY: Oh, we have, Tim. The sanctions were announced Thursday. It’s now Sunday. I think things have gotten so bad inside Iran, from the standpoint of the Iranian people, my belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators.

RUSSERT: But what if your analysis is not correct — again? Let’s put up on the screen part of an interview The New York Times’s Thom Shanker did with the new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen: “With America at war in two Muslim countries, he said, attacking a third Islamic nation in the region ‘has extraordinary challenges and risks associated with it.’ The military option, he said, should be a last resort.” Your own chairman of the Joint Chiefs does not think the military can handle a third war.

CHENEY: If Admiral Mullen wants to be Admiral Sullen, that’s his business. I’m not going to be a defeatist or question the courage of our fighting men.

RUSSERT: Critics say that if you attack Iran, there will be riots in every Muslim capital, the Iranians will flood Iraq with more explosives and money for the Shiite militias. They say you’ll only end up making more enemies for America, and our troops.

CHENEY: Why don’t we just give the Islamofascists Sudetenland, Tim? Peace in our time.

RUSSERT: The Europeans are upset that you might start another war in their backyard.

CHENEY: (Rolling his eyes and muttering under his breath) Eurappeasers.

RUSSERT: An Iranian spokesman dismissed the new U.S. sanctions as “worthless and ineffective” and said they were “doomed to fail as before.” And Gen. Mohammad Ali Jafari, the head of Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards — a group you have accused of proliferating weapons of mass destruction — also warned that his forces would respond with an “even more decisive” strike if attacked.

CHENEY: Don’t worry about General Ali Baba, Tim. We gave the Israelis his home address.

RUSSERT: How will you even know where to bomb, given that all the experts say the Iranians have hidden their real nuclear facilities underground?

CHENEY: Can you say magic carpet bombing, Tim? We didn’t build those bunker busters just to stack ’em up in a warehouse in North Dakota.

RUSSERT: It’s so close to the next election, Mr. Vice President, shouldn’t you just keep on the diplomatic track and let the next president make this decision?

CHENEY: You really want Rudy Giuliani playing with the nuclear button, Tim? Now, that’s insane.

Update: Sherry Jackson Trial May Be Going to Jury Tuesday

Update: Day one of the Sherry Peel Jackson trial is over, with the first half going the way of jury selection. Key witnesses were called to the stand for the prosecution, while the day ended with Ms. Jackson's testimony. There's a very good chance the case will go to jury tomorrow, so everyone please cross your fingers in the name of justice and the rule of law. Full audio of today's witnesses and testimony can be heard here.


Prosecutor: Richard M. Langway
404-581-6000
richard.langway@usdoj.gov

Contact him with regards to his blatant disrespect to the rule of law, and the attack on his fellow Americans.

UN Chief Scolds Israel Over Syria Bombing

Sunday longtime Director General of the IAEA Mohamed ElBaradei criticized Israel's September raid on a Syrian building they claim was a nuclear installation. The U.S. were the only ones that were shown the so-called "evidence" of a nuclear installation, and Israel decided to commit yet another war crime by going ahead with the strike. ElBaradei says as everyone knows that the IAEA nor anyone else received any evidence at all of a Syrian nuke site.

"That to me is very distressful because we have a system: if countries have information that the country is working on a nuclear-related program, they should come to us. We have the authority to go out and investigate," he said.

"But to bomb first and then ask questions later, I think it undermines the system and it doesn't lead to any solution to any suspicion, because we are the eyes and ears of the international community."

Tancredo Says His Days in Congress are Over

Tom Tancredo will likely join the growing list of politicians and former politicians ala Mike Gravel who come out against the lies of big government when he steps down from his seat in the House after the elections. After writing his book 'In Mortal Danger' he obviously has a lot to say that he knows he can't get away with saying in Congress. He is well-known for his embracing the truth such as welcoming Ron Paul as a bona-fide presidential contender. More and more well-versed politicians and big names are coming out against things like the New World Order and 9/11 lies, and I suspect a good man like Tancredo to be no different.

The five-term lawmaker said illegal immigration, his core issue, now has national prominence and he doesn't need to remain in Congress to promote it.

"The issue now has a life of its own and it doesn't need one particular person to champion it," he said.

"I feel my job, my task, has been completed. And I am very much at peace with the idea that if I'm not elected president then I won't be running" for another term in Congress, he said.

...

He said he wants to stay involved in public policy after he leaves the House.

Sherry Peel Jackson Trial Begins Today Amid Media Blackout

The trial of former IRS agent Sherry Peel Jackson against the lawfulness of the federal income tax begins this morning in Atlanta, and the media are ignoring every bit of it. I doubt it will even get much if any local attention at all, so the supporter turnout could be a huge deciding factor. Updates will be posted daily at Truthattack.


9:30 a.m. - Oct. 29, 2007
Courtroom 1908
U.S. Courthouse
75 Spring St. S.W.
Atlanta, Georgia

Prosecutor: Richard M. Langway
404-581-6000
richard.langway@usdoj.gov

Contact him with regards to his blatant disrespect to the rule of law, and the attack on his fellow Americans.

Faux News Panel on Sunday Offers Up More Neocon Rhetoric on Iran

Mainstream media puppet boy Brit Hume and insane neocon Zionist Bill Kristol were on Fox News late this morning spilling more filth about Iran, this time aiming for the anti-war [with Iran] Democrats that they say refuse to threaten Iran with brutal military action, calling them weak. They talked up the new sanctions on Iran, and claim the Bush administration doesn't have to disclose what the extra $80+ billion funds for bunker-busting bombs is for, stating "there might be others we want to bomb."

Doesn’t it make sense that you want Iran to believe that if you keep this up, they might be the subject of a devastating military strike of the kind that only the United States of America can mount. I would think so. And it seems to me when you have Democrats running around, wringing their hands about alleged saber rattling that it makes them look terribly weak, and in the end if you’re the head of Iran, you think, “well, we want those people in charge.”

Rudy Giuliani's Campaign Lies Again; 9/11 Commission Report Leaked

Rudy Giuliani's 9/11 Commission testimony in 2004 was not supposed to be released until after next year's elections, but apparently it has leaked out, and The Village Voice got a hold of it. Giuliani and his campaign staff have been possibly the biggest liars of all the presidential candidates, and that is not a small feat by any means. The puzzling part of this is that he has been caught time and time again, yet he is still labeled as the front runner, oddly enough. Elections are a fraud, and this is evidence enough. Anyone that supports this guy needs to have their head examined.

In a recent broadside deriding the Clinton administration's response to Al Qaeda, Rudy Giuliani told an audience at Pat Robertson's Regent University: "Bin Laden declared war on us. We didn't hear it. I thought it was pretty clear at the time, but a lot of people didn't see it, couldn't see it." Other tenets of his standard stump speech include the assertion that he's been "studying terrorism" for more than 30 years, and that "the thing that distinguishes me on terrorism is that I have more experience in dealing with it" than the other presidential candidates.

However, in private testimony before the 9/11 Commission in 2004, Rudy gave a very different version of how much he knew about terrorism when the World Trade Center was attacked. That testimony isn't scheduled to be released publicly until after the 2008 presidential election, but the Voice has obtained a copy of it. And it reveals a New York mayor who was anything but an "expert on terrorism."

Pennsylvania Refuses to Release List of Polling Places in Fear of 'Terrorists'

Fearmongering is so bad these days that state officials in Pennsylvania have stated that they will not be releasing their statewide list of polling places this election season in order to "protect the public and the integrity of the voting process." They say they made the decision as an attempt to deter any chance of 'terrorism' that could disrupt the elections, basing it on the 2004 bombing incident that interrupted SPAIN's elections. This is beyond odd. Completely ridiculous. Put out the word everyone that Pennsylvania apparently has a huge 'terrorist' problem we don't know about. Do not visit there under any circumstances if you want to protect yourself.

Critics say concealing the compiled list runs afoul of the state's open records law and makes coordinating statewide voter-mobilization strategies more difficult.

``If the government has a record, and has it in electronic form, they should release it to any citizen who requests it,'' said Stephanie Frank Singer, founder of a Philadelphia consulting firm that provides customized lists and data collection for political campaigns and nonprofit groups.

Singer said she is considering challenging the decision.

It's unclear how many other states compile similar lists, and whether the ones that do make them available to the public.

The comprehensive list helps candidates for statewide office coordinate volunteer get-out-the-vote efforts, Singer said.

Romney Gets Schooled By 15 Year Old

Thursday was another tough day for Mitt Romney in New Hampshire. This time it wasn't because of a wheelchair-bound muscular dystrophy sufferer, but a 15 year old sophomore in high school. The topic was Romney's flip-flopping 'views' on gay marriage and abortion, and how in the world anyone can actually believe a word the man says. Apparently his campaign's 'Ask Mitt anything' is backfiring, but it's not surprising considering his ridiculously shoddy views on important issues and total lack of principles.

Kevin Daly got a lesson Thursday in Presidential Politics 101.

The sophomore at Phillips Exeter Academy pointedly asked Republican candidate Mitt Romney about his shifting positions on abortion and gay rights.

As governor of Massachusetts, Romney indicated he would not change state laws on abortion rights, now he opposes abortion. During the 1994 Senate campaign in Massachusetts, Romney indicated he would be a better advocate for gay rights than rival Democrat Edward M. Kennedy.

"How can any of your campaign promises be trusted?" Daly asked.

Romney suggested the 15-year-old from Weston, Mass., had falsely stated that he favored gay marriage in 1994.

Around and around the two went, with Daly referring to a New York Times report about the gay rights pledge. The second time through, he mistakenly said the story detailed a "gay marriage" pledge.

That was enough for Romney.

"Even The New York Times hasn't said I'll be stronger on gay marriage than Ted Kennedy, even The New York Times," Romney said. "I've never been an advocate of gay marriage."

Blackwater Employees Say Iraqi Slaughter Was Unjustified

Two former and four current employees of Blackwater have spoken out on the mass killings of innocent Iraqis over a month ago that company officials say was in defense.

“Some guys are thinking that it was not a good shoot, that it was not warranted,” said one Blackwater contractor, using military jargon for an episode that results in a wrongful death. “I don’t think there was criminal intent involved. I just think it was the application of the use of deadly force gone horribly wrong.”

He added, “To mitigate one threat, 17 people had to die?” ...

“I’m just trying to hold on,” said one member of the Blackwater convoy that was involved in the Sept. 16 killings, in an e-mail message. “They’ve been trying to bring in so many State agents, it’s getting full over here.” ...

According to Blackwater employees, the leader of the convoy on Nisour Square was a man known as Hoss. He and two or three other members of the team have returned to the United States because their tours of duty were up or their contracts with the company had ended, one employee here said. In Hoss’s case, the trip home was to remove shrapnel from a wound he received before the Sept. 16 shootings.

Beating the War Drums; More U.S. Sanctions on Iran

The hypocritical Bush administration is using the labeling of the Revolutionary Guard Corps of Iran as a terrorist group to press on with new sanctions against Iran, this time focusing on the blacklisting of Iranian banks as an attempt to somehow destabilize their military.

"These actions will help to protect the international financial system from the illicit activities of the Iranian government," Rice said.

"They will provide a powerful deterrent to every international bank and company that thinks of doing business with the Iranian government."

The move was the latest by the US administration to step up pressure on Iran, which it accuses of fomenting global terrorism, supporting insurgents in Iraq and working to develop an atomic bomb.

Unbelievable is the utter gall and puppetry of this woman.

Rice, who on Wednesday said that Iranian policies posed "perhaps the single greatest challenge" to US security, reiterated the United States was committed to resolving the crisis through diplomatic means.

But she warned: "If they choose to continue down a path of confrontation, the US will act with the international community to resist these threats of the Iranian regime."

Iran poses the single greatest challenge to our security? Again they are lumping our country's 'security' in with that of their terrorist occupation in Iraq. She is taking orders from the lowest of the administration, and that little smidgen of a backbone that sometimes squeezes out is now reduced to this.

Iranian officials say that this is just a precursor to their actual plan to attack them, and it will ultimately backfire calling it a 'strategic mistake.'

In Washington, the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation said the unilateral sanctions would trigger a "backlash" from President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and other hardliners in the Iranian regime.

They can "only undermine US security interests, in part by putting US troops in Iraq at risk of retaliation and hampering talks with Iran over Iraq security," said the center's Iran analyst, Carah Ong.

And they are correct. How is adding bogus sanctions an attempt to go the 'diplomatic' route? That is skewed anti-American corruption logic for you, and Bush/Cheney along with all the other crazy neocons desperately want this war before they leave office.

"It is plain and simple -- reputable institutions do not want to be bankers to this dangerous regime," Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said.

US officials said these would be the broadest sanctions imposed on Iran since the country's Islamic revolution in 1979. It is also the first time the United States has directly sanctioned another country's military.

What the secretary does not say is how 'reputable institutions' do not really want to do business with us anymore, as the Federal Reserve and Treasury coincide to kill our currency into nothingness. He also implies that somehow Russia and China have no important 'institutions.' This will not change their minds one bit.

Israeli FM Says a Nuclear Iran Not a Threat

In a bit of a follow-up to the Haaretz story in their upcoming battle with their own country's lobby, Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni apparently said recently that if Iran did successfully develop nuclear weapons they posed no "existential" threat to Israel. Ironically, this story just popped up on Haaretz, so maybe they are truly waging war on the Lobby. I wouldn't go that far, but this is refreshing to say the least. Everyone in Israel seems to be beating the war drums except for their foreign minister in this case.

Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni said a few months ago in a series of closed discussions that in her opinion that Iranian nuclear weapons do not pose an existential threat to Israel, Haaretz magazine reveals in an article on Livni to be published tomorrow.

Livni also criticized the exaggerated use that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is making of the issue of the Iranian bomb, claiming that he is attempting to rally the public around him by playing on its most basic fears. Last week, former Mossad chief Ephraim Halevy said similar things about Iran.

The article also reveals for the first time a document Livni prepared and sent to Olmert a few months after the Second Lebanon War proposing a new division of labor between the two. "Enclosed is a proposal for work procedures between us, with the aim of providing an answer to Israel's strategic needs and facilitating early planning and the formulation of coordinated Israeli positions ... within the framework of cooperative relations, full transparency and continuous mutual updates," wrote Livni.

McCain Skips Out on DREAM Act Vote; Possibly to Save Face in His Hopeless Campaign?

As expected, the covert new old DREAM Act bill was put to a quick vote around lunchtime today. The vote was to move it forward, and it failed by votes of 52-44, amusingly enough after bill sponsor Dick Durbin had the last word before vote, going on a little ignorant spiel about "these are kids and we're doing this for the children." Afterwards [the vote], and not all that surprising, Harry Reid got up on his little podium and explained that he was discussing with the Republicans on what to do next. So this is far from over, and I mean before the Senate adjourns for the year; the nightmare doesn't stop here by any means.

But anyway, what was odd today was that mister immigration flip-flopper himself wasn't there, presidential candidate John McCain. Why would he miss out on a vote on one of the hottest issues? It looks like if you consider yourself a legitimate candidate that you wouldn't allow yourself to miss a vote such as this, standing up for the very issue that you've been being ridiculed on since you began. Have fun answering those questions on the campaign trail, John.

McCain's campaign offered no explanation for why he sat out the vote.

"Sen. McCain had to catch a flight to Iowa right after the Southwick vote," the spokesman said in an e-mail to the Huffington Post. "I'm sure he'll address the issue in more detail in Iowa."

McCain's campaign announced yesterday that he was skipping "his New Hampshire events scheduled for tomorrow, October 24th, to return to Washington to vote on the nomination of Judge Leslie Southwick to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit."

Blackwater Wants Supporters to Flood Congressmen With Lies

The vigorous leaders of Blackwater are now taking their image-saving campaign to a whole new level after being finally booted out of Iraq. They have sent out a mass e-mail to their supporters urging them to contact their congressmen with calls, e-mails, and letters telling them verbatim that somehow the company is an asset in cost management, professional 'mature' employees with impressive experience, and of all things, pride in the amount of U.S. lives saved, leaving out the bad parts of course.

Blackwater’s claim to cost efficiency is specious at best. According to documents made available to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, “It costs the U.S. government a lot more to hire contract employees as security guards in Iraq than to use American troops.”

According to the data, “the average per-day pay to personnel Blackwater hired was $600,” which is significantly more than uniformed soldiers:

An unmarried sergeant given Iraq pay and relief from U.S. taxes makes about $83 to $85 a day, given time in service. A married sergeant with children makes about double that, $170 a day.

Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Baghdad overseeing more than 160,000 U.S. troops, makes roughly $180,000 a year, or about $493 a day. That comes out to less than half the fee charged by Blackwater for its senior manager of a 34-man security team.

American Jew Says Israel Lobby Going After Haaretz

It really warms the soul when you hear from a pure and decent Jewish American voicing his analytical rights about Israel and its lobbies. Haaretz is a very popular Israel-based newspaper/online 'zine that focuses on all things Jews, Israel, and the Middle East. It is known by millions around the world for its somewhat unbiased views of those subjects compared to other Israel/Jewish-affiliated newspapers and mags. The author of the article attended a conference hosted by CAMERA, another textbook biased member group of the American-based Israel Lobby which looks to defame anyone with differing views. The leader of CAMERA, Andrea Levin, basically says "the audacity of a world-wide Israeli paper writing about the truth in the Middle East."

No other newspaper in Israel matters, Levin says, because Ha'aretz is an elite publication and it has such an amazing English-language website. It is read by millions around the world. "None of the other papers is having international impact." All true.

"We feel directly affected by Haaretz... we feel we should be directly interacting as much as possible... putting more resources into that, because of its direct effect on all of us." I believe that Levin said she had even appealed to government bodies in Israel, including the IDF, to do something about Haaretz stories. The speech ended with the call to arms, for CAMERA members to start pressuring Haaretz. "Write, phone, challenge, speak out... Haaretz is now affecting all of us."

The Israel Lobby has been under increasing scrutiny as of late, all of which is much warranted, and the same tactics being used by fading American neocons are being used by the Lobby, or the other way around you could say. This short article is a must-read that goes on to say Levin stated that Haaretz should follow suit of the American newspapers with their easily noticeable one-sided views, and also allow the Lobby members themselves to post their propaganda in op-ed pieces; and I hope Haaretz has the courage and willpower to stay the course for the sake of truth and fairness as they've shown many times in the past.

Podhoretz Gets Pissed at Book Crowd

Apparently the dangerous textbook neocon quack Norman Podhoretz got a little enraged over a crowd at a Barnes and Noble book signing who offered up real questions against his anti-American rhetoric and disinformation. He was there to promote his new book that might as well be titled 'I Love Fascism, But Use It In My Propaganda.' Podhoretz is of course one of Giuliani's main foreign policy contributors, and does his best to garner conservative Jewish support.

Asked whether there should be a fresh investigation into 9/11, Podhoretz simply dismissed the suggestion as "paranoia" and refused to answer the question.

He later defended the fact that he signed the infamous Project For a New American Century documents, a Neo-Con manifesto for world domination that includes advocating the use of race-specific bio-weapons, and claimed that the PNAC had been "misrepresented".

Podhoretz then admitted that the CIA had overthrown the U.S.-friendly Iranian government of Mohammad Mossadegh in the 50's, but called it "ancient history."

He then went on to make a case that Iran was behind the violence in Iraq and had formed an alliance with Al-Qaeda, despite the fact that the two are Shia and Sunni respectively and as such are arch-enemies. He was then educated about how in fact it was the U.S. government that is funding Al-Qaeda affiliated groups to attack Iran. This mattered little to Podhoretz, who was then asked why we should "fight back" against Iran by bombing them when they had never attacked us?

Podhoretz's answer was to state that, "We were attacked by Islamofascists on 9/11," clearly implying that Iran attacked the U.S. on 9/11. Such unmitigated and bellicose propaganda might fly on Fox News, but many members of the audience were having none of it, asking why they should trust Bush and the Neo-Cons after being lied to for six years.

"Why don't you shut up," barked Podhoretz, seemingly having abandoned his ceaseless regurgitation of warmongering rhetoric and finally losing his temper.

Several members of the audience were kicked out of the store by cops but as Podhoretz left he was heckled again as protesters chanted "No Iran war," before ducking into a vehicle and scurrying away.

Even the more hellbent neocons like Podhoretz have to be getting the clear message now that their days of controlling the foreign policy in this country are coming to an abrupt and ugly end.

Hillary Said She'd Give Up 'Some Powers'

Let us not forget who this is coming from. Hillary Clinton said in an interview with the UK's Guardian America that she would in fact be 'willing' to part with 'some' of the unconstitutional executive powers snatched up by the Bush administration. She went on to sidestep a few last questions, but before that scarily mentioned Abraham Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus, obviously stating her apparent approval for a 'temporary' situation such as that, even though what Lincoln did clearly goes against the constitution, of what she is attempting to show support for in this interview. She is clearly letting it be known that she has all the power in the world as president to do the things that the Bush administration did, only she doesn't wish to make them 'permanent.' She says she would do away with 'some' powers, as if that is a logistical answer. There is nothing in the interview that should sway anyone's opinion of her as being nothing more than a neocon sheep in wolves clothing, but if she does plan on speaking up more on these anti-American executive powers, she better be quite aware of her past.

Harry Reid Enacts Rule 14 For DREAM Act Amnesty Bill

A big question on many peoples minds this past week is not if, but when the Senate would bring back up the dreaded loop-holed DREAM Act amnesty bill. This morning, Harry Reid made the first move and enacted Rule 14, which permits the senator to bypass debate or committee procedure. He knows that if he allows the people of this country to have their say on this extremely heated issue, it will be killed again and again. There is a very good chance it could be brought up tomorrow on the Senate floor, but that is highly unlikely if the news spreads like wildfire, which wouldn't surprise me at all. The holes in the bill have been gone over plenty of times, so don't let anyone fool you over the betterment of kids' lives. All this does is reward their parents and families with amnesty just for coming here illegally and having numerous anchor babies. That 90,000 number the supporters been throwing around would quickly turn into millions. This bill has failed many times in the past, and it is still the same old dated and flawed bill it was then.

This proves that Reid and other members of congress insist that they know what is best, and that the American people have no say anymore. As you know, they have failed in that regard for way too long, unless you've been living under a rock with regards to the shape this country is in. It is time to bring liberty and sovereignty back to this country while we can. It is highly likely the bill will fail again when it's brought up this week, but only if Americans bring another firestorm on the defiant members of congress, which means doing the same tired out things you've had to do countless times already this year.



E-mail Harry Reid
Phone Harry Reid: 202-224-3542
Senate Immigration Hotline: 1-800-417-7666
U.S. Capital Switchboard: 202-224-3121

Government Attempting to Cap the Price of Gold By Selling its Reserves

The U.S. Dollar is in grave danger. A lot of people already know that, but this is just the icing on the cake. Fort Knox houses the majority of the United States' gold reserves. The Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury have been printing money over the past few years that we simply don't have, and of which we have absolutely no record of because the government decided to quietly stop telling the world how much 'fiat' money it prints. Huge credit goes out to the writer of the original article.

As the anti-American outrageous spending continues with this government, they are willing to pull out all stops to continue their ways, legal or not. They are now apparently, or at least ready to, selling off the many reserves of gold being held at Fort Knox in Kentucky in order to cap the price of gold in the markets, as an attempt to sell that the U.S. Dollar is still a legitimate world reserve currency. The world is not that stupid, and this article is definitely not something media wants you to know. We are on the verge of collapse, and they just want to keep spending no matter what. It is time to help elect Ron Paul, or be on the opposite end of the revolution. When will Wall Street wake the hell up like the foreigners??

Suspicions Were Right; Ed and Elaine Brown Were Tortured

In the first interview with Ed Brown since he and Elaine were kidnapped 2 weeks ago by U.S. Marshals and the government on charges of an imaginary income tax law, long-time supporter and creator of Make The Stand Shaun Kranish was able to get through with the Ohio prison and record a 10 minute interview (mp3 audio included) with Mr. Brown. He confirmed, with a horribly raspy voice, that in fact there was torture involved. He talked about being tasered multiple times and thrown to the ground during the time of the arrest for absolutely no reason, being sent to a detention center where he was enclosed and gassed through the ventilation system for very long periods of time that lasted for days, Elaine being gruesomely tortured to the point that he would not disclose any of the information, and who knows what other things went on that weren't told about. And now he is in an Ohio prison away from anyone that can help him, still freezing cold from the gases so bad that he can't even walk outside, in a tiny cell that can only be described as solitary confinement.

Elaine's son has been barred from talking to his mother, and Ed has not been able to make any phone calls, or send any mail out. The local police in Lebanon housed the couple for some time. They had no business doing that, and it shows that the local cops there have no respect for the rule of law either. They are supposed to be our protection from a criminal government. I am going to really try hard and get personal information on anyone and everyone involved, and that includes the two weaselly judges in New Hampshire that think they can just rule against the law in an unfair trial, then back out of future related trials after getting a little deserved heat thrown at them. McAuliffe's has already been released to the public, although I'm not sure it is still available, but perhaps it needs to be spread anyway. That is what happens when you turn against the people of a nation in favor of big government. They are all domestic enemies working for the most evil government in U.S. history. If our information is out there for their disposal so they can commit warrantless searches, spy on us, and cough up bogus trials, then their info should be as well. This is your government. It is your duty to at least get the information out to your fellow citizens. Either start helping now, or have this kind of thing happen to you when martial law is thrown into your lives. Some people said the movie 'Enemy of the State' was pure nonsense, that it just added unneeded fuel to the 'nut-jobs' out there, and that it could never happen to us. I don't know how anyone can think that now.

Romney Calls UN a Failure; But for Snake-like Reasons

Mitt Romney said this morning in South Carolina that the UN is a failure, and proposed a new coalition of 'free nations of the world' to cater the needs of the greater good, or rather U.S./Israel interests. He thinks this because, in his mind, the UN is too tough on Israel, and lets slide anything going on in the Arab world. Romney has repeatedly fed the interests of his biggest campaign donors since he entered the race, which in large part are the very wealthy Jewish pro-Israel contributors. They are is his main financiers, and he is merely speaking for them, not the American people. So this is not surprising that he would come out and say something like this, considering he's about to be looking at the behind of Ron Paul as far as campaign funding and momentum goes. One can't help but remember in January when he took a lengthy trip to Israel to do just this. He purposefully skipped visiting Gaza. He is willing to ignore the numerous human rights violations, with the same old excuses that Israel is getting an 'unfair deal.' Maybe he should put down the European Union, Great Britain, China, and others for their opposition to things like the increasing sanctions on Gaza. Romney is simply looking out for his campaign's pocket, trying to keep up with the momentum of Ron Paul.

One thing that was said in the actual article caught my eye:

The Romneys have five sons and ten grandchildren. Of the leading Republicans in the presidential contest, Romney is the only one who has not been divorced.

The last time I checked, polygamy has played a part in Romney's life. And as even confirmed by the Republican National Committee, Ron Paul is a now a 'top-tier' candidate. As you should know, Paul has been married for 50+ years, and has never been divorced. I guess the writer just forgot...

'Hillary Clinton Would Use Violence Against Tehran'

Well, duh. That was the title of an article Monday in the UK's Guardian Unlimited stating:

In an article for Foreign Affairs magazine intended as a blueprint for the foreign policy of a future Clinton White House, the Democratic frontrunner argues that Iran poses a long term strategic challenge to American and its allies, and that it must not be permitted to build or acquire nuclear weapons.

"If Iran does not comply with its own commitments and the will of the international community, all options must remain on the table," Ms Clinton said.

Elsewhere, Ms Clinton took the edge off her steely posture by saying she would abandon the Bush administration's policy of isolating its enemies, and would deploy diplomacy.

"True statesmanship requires that we engage with our adversaries, not for the sake of talking but because robust diplomacy is a prerequisite to achieving our aims."

She says she would even consider offering incentives to Iran in return for a pledge to disarm. However, she sets out a series of stringent conditions that are virtually identical to current White House policy.

"If Iran is in fact willing to end its nuclear weapons programme, renounce sponsorship of terrorism, support Middle East peace, and play a constructive role in stabilising Iraq, the United States should be prepared to offer Iran a carefully calibrated package of incentives," Ms Clinton wrote.

The only reason Clinton hasn't been willing to disclose any of her foreign policy plans is because she doesn't want to be seen as the warmongering constitution-shredding dictator that she aims to be. If her supporters can't read between these lines here, we may really have a problem. As usual, Hillary is looking out for ol' number one, Israel. The only question is, where does that leave Americans? Number two? Iran does not pose a threat to the U.S. Israel has the right to defend itself with nukes, but Iran doesn't have the right to start its own nuclear energy program? Perhaps she should address some of the things that Israel is doing, like not helping us one bit. They are a useless ally that follows no rules but their own, and have shown time and time again that they could care less about our safety. What I don't understand is how voters can not be seriously tired of them using our military as pawns in their sick demagogic game. We all know where the majority of Clinton's campaign funds come from. If Israel wants it, Israel will get it with a Clinton White House.

Nationally Televised Bipartisan Debate On Energy Possibly Snubbing Ron Paul

The MSNBC-televised debate next month is being put together by the Greater Houston Partnership and the Sierra Club, focusing on many issues dealing with "oil and gas drilling and nuclear power." Even though Ron Paul is a representative of the Houston area, even though his fresh ideas on oil and alternative sources of energy are tenfold that of the other Republican candidates, and even though he has seemingly leapfrogged "I'll talk to my lawyers" Romney as a top tier candidate, they have not yet invited him to speak. They claim that they compiled the list of candidates 2-3 months ago based on their estimate on who the the top contenders were at the time, which would make it even more bizarre that Fred Thompson is included, seeing as he wasn't even a candidate at the time. The fact that they would put together a serious debate on issues and base their candidate choices on two or more months ago is absurd, especially considering John McCain was plummeting at the time. The Houston Chronicle says however that the Partnership is considering adding four more candidates, including Paul, although I'm not so sure that they would even think of such if Clinton hadn't turned them down. The momentum of Ron Paul is colossal in size right now. The hit pieces, ridicule, and media blackouts are only getting started.

The Greater Houston Partnership
1200 Smith - Ste. 700
Houston, TX 77002

713.844.3600
Fax: 713.844.0200
ghp@houston.org

New York Times Creates Room for More Israel/Syria Lies and Propaganda

Here we go again. One month later and we're still getting fed lies and assumptions in hopes of shaping policy in Israel's favor. The New York Times released an article Saturday which stated "Israeli and American intelligence analysts" have come up with the apparent foregone conclusion that the Israeli strike on Syria was "in fact" the beginnings of a nuclear reactor. The 'Times' writers decided to spin the events of the past month in such a way as to put all guilt on Syria, to suggest Arab opposition to a Syrian nuclear facility, and to add no such debate to the actual reality in the facility ever being there in the first place. Despite this being 100% legal, despite the fact that it could have been used for energy purposes, despite Israel hiding the fact that they have their own worrisome stockpile of nukes, and despite the fact that it would have taken cash-strapped Syria no less than seven or more years to produce any nuclear capabilities (not to mention not even having the cash to complete it in that short of time, even with the help of North Korea), you still have to be highly skeptical that what they hit was even the beginnings of a reactor at all.

This is becoming more suspicious by the day with all the silence coming from administrations of both Israel and the U.S. At first, there were highly peculiar reports of Israel both "possibly" and "surely" having "satellite photos" of a Syrian nuke site which were passed along to the U.S., but there is no way that could have been true, as they seem to be slowly but surely talking their way towards that notion again. If there were conclusive evidence of a nuke site, there wouldn't be all this misinformation floating around. And why is it taking so long for these revelations to come about? There is absolutely no way Israel had any proof of a partial nuke site. It is straight-up nonsense. The Neo-con(Fox) News Channel has already ran with the story nationally today as if everything in the article is 100% accurate, and throwing the what-ifs about North Korea in as well for good measure. No stock should be put in the mainstream media's reporting of Middle East affairs, especially when it has anything to do with Israel. When will people learn? Belief in disinformation is so much more comforting for people here in America, and for the most part Israel, but some tend to prefer the truth.

The UN has said they are working on either confirming or denying the reports, and that they have not received any satellite or intelligence reports from Israel or the U.S. An American analyst had this to say:

"A very real question is whether Syria is technically and financially able to build such a reactor. It would be hard to justify an air strike on a facility so early on in construction and, if supplied by North Korea, unlikely ever to be finished," U.S. analyst David Albright, alluding to North Korea's nuclear disarmament agreement earlier this year, told Reuters.

"Israel may have wanted to send a signal to Iran. The U.S. wants to scare Iran (off nuclear work) and this air strike might have been a way to do it, and explain some of Israel's secrecy."

UN Finally Decides to Investigate War Crimes in Iraq

These ruthless savage killers may finally have their day in court it seems, although it should include Bush for his constant support at the very least. The UN said today that it will begin investigating whether Blackwater committed war crimes or crimes against humanity for the careless savage killings of 17 Iraqi civilians, among countless other incidents involving Blackwater and numerous other private security contractors in the country. The UN apparently wants to make sure that countries employing these idiots are willing to hold them responsible, and enact the rule of law. Obviously this has to be insulting for our government. They think they or anyone they are associated with don't have to follow the rule of law, or be accountable for their actions. This needs to go further than just contractors. If defiance ensues, I won't be surprised at all. A group of Iraqis related to the 17 killings, mostly victims and family members, have filed suit in Washington, but you know how that will go.

Said Arikat, the UN mission spokesman, urged the Bush administration to hold accountable those involved in indiscriminate shooting; "to apply the rules of engagement and prosecute them". He added: "There cannot be rogue elements that are above the law. Definitely, we will be driving that point home time and again."

'Supreme Disgrace' Is Right

That was the title of an op-ed in today's New York Times opinion column after Tuesday's ruling the slimy U.S. Supreme Court made in the case of Khaled el-Masri, the German citizen of Lebanese heritage who was allegedly kidnapped by the CIA in a case of mistaken identity, where he was then tortured extensively, interrogated, and sent to Afghanistan where he was detained for months. Since extraordinary-rendition was allowed to grow thanks to Clinton, it has become increasingly clear that the government wants to use the "war on terror" as a way to gain full control over anybody and everybody they deem fit.

They ruled in the case that this man's human rights were less important than disclosing "state secrets." That is what you call an admission of guilt, but they're just not willing to pay for their own actions like they want us to. They don't even want us to have the chance. How is the world going to view this, not to mention adding it to our already scarily bad foreign policy? Our administration wants the world to follow their orders, and follow their ideas of how they should live and run their countries, but yet they pull something like this. This administration has a stranglehold over our judicial system, and it has to stop. The Supreme Court turned down an appeal without a single comment, and the use of the state secrets doctrine is all they could come up with in not even willing to hear the case. Our judges no longer represent law or the common citizen, but lawbreakers in our own country who hide under the phrase "national security." What national security? They are taking that away whether we like it or not. While they have the typical sheep here terrified of other groups of people, they're destroying our sovereignty right under our own eyes daily in cases like this.

This proves that the majority of our judicial system has no desire to grant the will of the people in this country, or follow the rule of law as the constitution states. This is no longer a democracy. We're living in slave-state of tyranny under ruthless dictators, and if some citizens of this country feel the need to vote in another dictator candidate, they deserve the same tragic fate that should ultimately come down to their rulers. Judges Thomas Selby Ellis III and Robert King, CIA director George J. Tenet, and CIA director Porter Goss are all fully to blame for this atrocity (can't forget Bush), but definitely not limited to, and all anger should be directed towards them. Germany should further release all names they have found involved in this illegal act for all to see, and against the will of our increasingly unstable government. If we're supposed to pay for our actions, they should be too, right?

Tyrannical Terrorists That Are The U.S. Marshals Finally Disclose "Location" of Ed Brown

Update: Ed Brown has been registered, and is now in Bureau of Prisons custody in Elkton, Ohio. Still no mugshots however, which leads me to believe they didn't exactly enter in 100% health.

Fat cat Stephen Monier finally announced earlier today that Ed Brown has been delivered to a federal prison in Ohio, but is still not listed as in custody according to their update database, and neither he nor Elaine have had their mugshots taken, or photographic proof of any kind. I really hate to imagine what has been done to him, and there is absolutely no reason for at least Elaine not having a mugshot yet.

The responses since Ed and Elaine Brown were finally taken into custody (or kidnapped by the government would be a better phrase) Friday have been nothing better than pathetic from the majority of sorry-ass common government slaves posing as free citizens, no doubt including the media, in this country. Still believing any constitution-ignoring government agency really cares whether they live or die (among other immoral ideologies) when they have an undermining objective against our interests or present-day law, most people have supported the U.S. Marshals through this whole ordeal. What they should be doing is reading about why the hell the government are doing this and how they're doing it, why they're trying to cut off any truth-bearing information that comes out, why they're using terrorist tactics with supporters, would-be supporters, and their families, and most of all, why the alleged criminals believe so strongly in what they have fought so hard for, and what it actually is. Cowardly citizens of this country are so afraid of the truth, or just a little bit of unbiased research these days. Their forefathers would have nothing of them. They show no shame. Even the ones that constantly spew their ugliness for all to see seem to be extra guilty of it, and I would say especially them actually, because they sit there and read these stories of government corruption repeatedly without a caring bone in their body, not taking one thought to realize that it could happen to them or someone they care about. What then? Will they care then? Will they undeservedly request the help of others? Of course they will. The moral resemblance is very close to our constitution killers in Washington, don't you think?

The phrase 'tax evader' is not a fun word nonetheless, and one the government can usually use at will to instantly discredit their target, especially in the media. Some people even report federal income tax fraud, as if they're somehow doing the country some kind of great justice (aside from the "reward" they sometimes get). Domestic enemies are all around us these days, which is why the word "foreign terrorist" doesn't scare me a fraction as much as the ones living right here. The gestapo U.S. Marshals weren't afraid of killing the Browns. They were afraid of the total press and public relations nightmare that would have followed, not to mention the wad of truth that would have come out. Their masters in Washington would not be happy about that at all, for this is their duty to follow bogus orders. And this is not even saying they didn't seriously try at times to take them out. Yet fat worthless cow order-taker Stephen Monier, traitor U.S. Marshal for New Hampshire, has actually been commended by some for his "patience" in not initiating a full-on attack on the Browns' estate. The gall. Our government needs patience to not attack and kill us in our own home? Whether it was shaking trailers, threatening supporters (to even rape them) and their families, cutting all service to the estate off, stealing all mail, possibly sending huge Blackwater vehicles out, firing shots all around the estate late at night, making warrantless searches and arrests of supporters, or even admitting their wrongness and lack of lawful reasoning at times, you can hardly call this patience.

This all stems from big government and the Treasury Department not wanting common folks to know its dirty little secrets. They want to continue their illegal activities without interruption or trouble, under any means necessary. They have, with the supreme help of honorless Judge Steven J. McAuliffe, willfully ignored the rule of law that goes along with the constitution, and this is where we Americans HAVE to draw the line sooner than later. It is growing increasingly clear all across the country, and even the world, that there is absolutely no law requiring the people of this country to file or pay a federal income tax to a privately owned anti-American central bank with corporate interests such as the Federal Reserve, and has willingly killed our national currency on the verge of utter collapse. The Fed is nothing but a complete fraud, along with its collection agency the IRS, and has absolutely no affiliation with the government. This is a fact that there is no income tax law. There is no gray line with this, so why in the world are we continuing to allow these creeps and their gestapo armies, with help from traitorous judges and local police, get away with this? They have sold out our country bit by bit over the past century, and now even our simple freedoms are slipping away. There will be a day when nothing is left but collapse, and all options are slim to none. As inevitable as it is, I would like to enter the next age of America with my liberties, pride, and self-respect intact. Who is to blame, and how can we call ourselves Americans if we sit and let them get away with it unscathed?

This will not be the last you'll hear from me on this by any means, because even as I write this, gestapo agents of the U.S. Marshals and Treasury Department are doing everything they can to make this go away. They want reasons, as bogus as they may be, to go after anyone that threatens to get in their way. It is beyond time true Americans make their jobs a living hell. The only thing these people pay attention to is fear. If they feel threatened in any way with you not breaking a single law, you know you've done your job. If this requires things such as posting the names and addresses of traitors (media included) who go against our fellow citizens and the constitution, so be it. We may have reached that time. If you have nothing to hide, there should really be no problem should there? Big government sure likes to use that in their interrogations. It works both ways. We can't let this go away. The more people know the truth, the worse off these tyrannical terrorists are.

Romney Shuns and Disrespects MD Patient

Mitt Romney further showed his true colors over the weekend in New Hampshire when confronted with a muscular dystrophy patient (with video) on the subject of medical marijuana. The falling bogus presidential candidate literally turned his back on the man after being asked whether Romney would arrest him or his doctors if he were to be given medical marijuana.

Following a campaign appearance in Dover, New Hampshire, a member of the audience, Clayton Holton, told Romney he has muscular dystrophy and said five of his doctors say he is "living proof medical marijuana works."

"I am completely against legalizing it for everyone, but there is medical purposes for it," Holton told Romney.

Romney pointed out that there is synthetic marijuana as well as other pain medications available.

"It makes me sick. I have tried it, and it makes me throw up," Holton said. "My question for you is will you arrest me or my doctors if I get medical marijuana."

"I am not in favor of medical marijuana being legal in the country," Romney said as he moved on to greet other people.

Holton continued, "Excuse me, will you please answer my question?"

"I think I have. I am not in favor of legalizing medical marijuana," the Massachusetts Republican said.

What a load of shit. Romney and the rest of the GOP candidates not named Paul are increasingly making it aware to common citizens that they simply don't care about them, and that if you want more of the same, vote for them. Nevertheless there will be countless idiots in the country who actually do, but that's another story. I would give anything for Romney or one his cohorts to have inherited a disease such as this. We could watch as they squirm for the best therapies and pain relievers, no matter the legality.

UK Police Outsourcing Calls to India

The UK seem to really be set in following in America's footsteps. They should see us as a method of failure, not improvement. UK police forces are now mulling over 200 companies, along with IBM, for the contracts to handle their large volume of calls. No one knows if all those people behind the phones now will ultimately lose their jobs, but we all know how that goes. If you call a police switchboard with a rather big problem, and you get someone in India, how is that going to make you feel?

Supreme Court: Politicians Can Lie

This is mind boggling. Puzzling. Ironic. On the eves of possibly the biggest presidential election ever, as far as our sovereignty and future as a nation goes, they want to legalize the lies that politicians make during their campaigns, even though the lies are a huge reason why we're in this predicament in the first place! Was it not lies that got us into a war with Iraq? Is there not more lying every single hour of the day attempting to get us into a conflict with Iran? This is unbelievable. Lying has become acceptable with politicians, at least in the state of Washington. This is exactly what we don't need. Our free speech and First Amendment rights are in danger more every day, and these pigs want to protect the rights of the assholes that do their best to keep us in this situation.

In the state of Washington, incompetence and deliberate falsehoods of a politician's campaign is now accepted. Why are politicians allowed to freely destroy our country, as well as our constitution, with lies, while at the same time being safeguarded by the very document they help belittle? This was a law that banned a candidate from INTENTIONALLY lying about their opponent.

Horrific Reactionary Bill Introduced Against Columbia

Republican congressman (CA) and bogus neoconservative presidential candidate Duncan Hunter introduced a bill (HR 3675) into the House (Education and Labor Committee) last week that would actually prohibit any and all grants or contracts with Columbia University. This stems from the University allowing Iranian President Ahmadinejad to come speak last month, where he was treated like a man with horns. They revoked his invitation to speak only a year ago.

Hunter has attacked free speech many times in the past, and this is no different. The neocon thief is not proposing this because of Columbia's ROTC program, or any other garbage he brings up in the bill. That is just a smoke screen he has added in to make it somehow look more legitimate, and to garner a little support, which he won't get. Bush himself didn't even have a problem with Ahmadinejad speaking. Even he is not that stupid. Hunter is complete and utter scum of a politician who repeatedly attacks the First Amendment, and is only doing this because he doesn't like hearing opposing views. Either buy into his propaganda, or lose your free speech.

(1) Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called for the destruction of the State of Israel, a critical ally of the United States.

(2) In January 2007, commander of Multinational Corps-Iraq, Lt. Gen. Ray Odierno stated that the United States had traced back to Iran serial numbers of weapons captured in Iraq, including rocket-propelled grenades, roadside bombs and Katyusha rockets.

(7) Through their invitation, Columbia University provided a public, prestigious platform on United States soil from which on September 24, 2007, President Ahmadinejad spoke and defended his wide-ranging support for terrorist activities.

As you can see, the bill is filled with nothing but lies and scare tactics. Some brainwashed mainstream media sheep are buying into it, but no way this bill goes very far. Duncan Hunter is a domestic enemy, and needs to be booted out of office. In his eyes, controversial speech should only be allowed if it is not in conflict with Israeli views. The more they think that, the worse it does for their "cause." Taking away our sovereignty doesn't help.

Renowned Minnesota University Bans Questioning of Isreali Terror

Winner of a Nobel Peace Prize and former Archbishop of South Africa, Desmond Tutu was apparently banned from the University of St. Thomas in Minneapolis because a handful of Jews in the area don't like what he has said, that for the most part has been directed at the Israeli government and their anti-American lobbies. The University's administration thought that his speaking the truth and questioning the wrongdoings of Israel was just too much.

St. Thomas is a Catholic university deep in their support for peace, and just about everyone affiliated with the school was pretty psyched about not just having someone like Tutu there, but hearing what he had to say. They had scheduled his appearance for this spring, but that now won't be happening. So why the hell would a Catholic university have a problem with it? Administration staff felt they had to make a few inquiries to local Jews to see what they thought about it, and not surprisingly the administration came away with the thought that merely Tutu's appearance there would offend them.

"We had heard some things he said that some people judged to be anti-Semitic and against Israeli policy," says Doug Hennes, St. Thomas's vice president for university and government relations. "We're not saying he's anti-Semitic. But he's compared the state of Israel to Hitler and our feeling was that making moral equivalencies like that are hurtful to some members of the Jewish community."

St. Thomas officials made this inference after Hennes talked to Julie Swiler, a spokeswoman for the Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas.

"I told him that I'd run across some statements that were of concern to me," says Swiler. "In a 2002 speech in Boston, he made some comments that were especially hurtful."

This has been happening all over America for a long time, as noted by St. Thomas professor Cris Toffolo:

"What happened at the University of St. Thomas is not an isolated event," says Toffolo. "Until we have an honest debate about U.S. policy related to Israel, and about Israeli policy in the Occupied Territories, the spiral of violence will continue."

Now say what you want about Desmond Tutu or of the bad things that have happened to South Africa since the fall of the apartheid, but the man has made very valid points in the past on Israel, its lobbies, its policies, and its human rights violations over the years. He has refuted claims of being antisemitic (who hasn't) many times in the past, and the points themselves are never really attacked. There are some Jews however that are outraged at the banning of Tutu, but these groups are few and far between as usual.

The truth is every real American should be outraged at this. Everything Israel does effects us because of our 100% cooperative government and horribly bad foreign policy, and not even being able to discuss these things is just unacceptable. So it hurts their feelings. I for one don't give a shit, not to mention that they're probably lying. The truth hurts. And they don't like it, so they try to shut us up any way possible. It's long past time to shut up the Israel lobbies in America.

"...I Hate All Iranians" - Bush Aide

I must have missed this over the weekend, and went through quite a lot of digging the past few days before I finally noticed it. It hasn't exactly made many headlines as far as I can tell, even though it most certainly should. Debra Cagan, a top foreign policy aide to Bush, apparently told members of the British Parliament visiting the Pentagon on September 11 that she hates "all Iranians."

The six MPs were taken aback by the hardline approach of the Pentagon and in particular Ms Cagan, one of Mr Bush's foreign policy advisers.

She made it clear that although the US had no plans to attack Iran, it did not rule out doing so if the Iranians ignored warnings not to develop a nuclear bomb.

It was her tone when they met her on September 11 that shocked them most.

The MPs say that at one point she said: "In any case, I hate all Iranians."

But the anonymous members of Parliament added more.

"She seemed more keen on saying she didn't like Iranians than that the US had no plans to attack Iran," said one MP. "She did say there were no plans for an attack but the tone did not fit the words."

Another MP said: "I formed the impression that some in America are looking for an excuse to attack Iran. It was very alarming."

Tory Stuart Graham, who was on the ten-day trip, would not discuss Ms Cagan but said: "It was very sobering to hear from the horse's mouth how the US sees the situation."

Ms Cagan, whose job involves keeping the coalition in Iraq together, also criticised Britain for pulling out troops.

"She said if we leave the south of Iraq, the Iranians will take it over," said one MP.

Another said: "She is very forceful and some of my colleagues were intimidated by her muscular style."

The Pentagon is, of course, denying this. But who do you really tend to believe? The UK media hasn't been one to lie over the past few years.

Thompson Makes Fool of Himself; Makes GOPs Look Worse

Fred Thompson is going to give the Democrats endless material to work with before his joke of a campaign is over with. The wannabe Bush-puppet warmongering dictator candidate now says that he is "certain" Iraq had WMD before the invasion, then backtracks and says he was talking about the 1980's. If this weren't enough, he used this statement to justify the war in Iraq.

"We can't forget the fact that although at a particular point in time we never found any WMD down there, he clearly had had WMD. He clearly had had the beginnings of a nuclear program," Thompson told an audience of about 60 at a Newton cafe.

Thompson later said he was referring to Saddam's attack on Kurdish northern Iraq with banned weapons in the 1980s.

"He acknowledged, I think, in filings made by the United Nations that prior to the invasion - sometime prior to the invasion - that he had chemical and biological weapons," Thompson said in a Des Moines Register interview. "I mean he used chemical weapons on the Kurds."

"I think." "Sometime in..." This man is a joke; an utter disgrace of a presidential candidate. Neocons sure have a lot of nerve. Didn't the U.S. support Iraq during that war? Didn't the UK have a pretty sizable hand in allowing Saddam to acquire nuclear weapons, and most definitely in storing/producing them? And didn't our troops use chemical weapons numerous times on the Iraqi people and its soldiers during the invasion? He justifies going to war because Saddam used chemical weapons, yet our military and coalition forces did the same thing. How many innocent Iraqis have died? And this guy expects people to believe they care(d) about the Kurds? Four years of Fred Thompson will be four more years of Bush. His supporters should be beyond ashamed. Did the upcoming election really need another bogus candidate? This man will rue the day when he finally gets up in front of people in a REAL debate. There is of course one candidate that he doesn't want to mess with under any circumstances. Be afraid, Fred. At least one candidate believes in the truth.

Warmonger Bolton Again Calls for Bombing of Iran

John Bolton, think-tank purveyor of Zionist lies and propaganda, is at it again. The former U.S. ambassador to the UN said Sunday that he sees no other option than to attack Iran. Why this guy is still allowed to spew his filth on the world is beyond me. Not only that, the man still has his supporters. It's time to bomb HIM, and people like him.

"I don't think the use of military force is an attractive option, but I would tell you I don't know what the alternative is."

Of course he doesn't. Rational thought left this man's skull long ago.

The fact that intelligence about Iran's nuclear activity was partial should not be used as an excuse not to act, Mr Bolton insisted. "Intelligence can be wrong in more than one direction." He asked how the British government would respond if terrorists exploded a nuclear device at home. "'It's only Manchester?' ... Responding after they're used is unacceptable."

Using his own logic there, the Middle East has every reason to hate Israel. This guy is not working for the American people. He's working for Israel and its American lobbyists. Iran's capabilities right now is equal to that of a nuclear power plant. He's trying to further justify going to war just on assumptions and lies, not that we haven't seen this before from the man.

However, he praised the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, and his forthright criticism of Iran in recent weeks.

Raising the spectre of George Bush's "axis of evil", Mr Bolton said that Kim Jong-il's regime in North Korea was akin to a "prison camp" and that he would "sell anything to anyone".

Those who thought North Korea would give up its nuclear capability voluntarily were wrong, he said.

Of course he's going to praise France's new nonconservative dictator. This isn't the same France that led the coalition against the U.S. invasion of Iraq. He knows that. Predictably, he also had to spread some of the propagandist lies that North Korea is helping Syria go nuclear, which is a laughable impossibility. You can read the whole article here.